Prediction of Min Seong Kim [] vs Christopher Heck [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W L W L
Form
L L W L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Kim 1 - 0 Heck
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Heck winning 0. The last match between Kim and Heck was at the M25 Anseong, 18-06-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Min Seong Kim getting the victory 7-6(4) 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Min Seong Kim | 1 |
| Christopher Heck | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Min Seong Kim
Player
Christopher Heck
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 10 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:7:0 | Average Match Time | 2:7:0 |
| 62% (32/52) | 1st Serve % | 64% (51/80) |
| 72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (33/51) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 44% (35/80) | Return Points Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Min Seong Kim vs Christopher Heck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Heck
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Heck has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heck has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heck has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Heck winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 8/ 20). Heck has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 7/ 8), where as Heck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 1 times and Heck being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Heck winning 0. The last match between Kim and Heck was at the M25 Anseong, 18-06-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Min Seong Kim getting the victory 7-6(4) 3-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Heck have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kim winning 0 times and Heck 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 1, and Heck 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Heck has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heck has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heck has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Min Seong Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taketo Takamisawa
Player
Min Seong Kim
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Heck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Louay Makke
Player
Christopher Heck
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Christopher Heck
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Christopher Heck
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Min Seong Kim
Player
Christopher Heck
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Junhyun Lee
Player
Christopher Heck
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jaesung Choe
Player
Christopher Heck
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Kim vs Heck?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kim Vs Heck is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29% (10/25) | Win/Loss | 20% (3/12) |
| 34% (27/53) | Sets Win/Loss | 24% (8/26) |
| 42% (328/449) | Games Win/Loss | 40% (131/199) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 36 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 34 | Total Double Faults | 24 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 18.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 17.87 |
| 50% (351/704) | 1st Serve % | 61% (202/332) |
| 60% (210/351) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (108/202) |
| 39% (136/353) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (53/130) |
| 42% (20/48) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (7/28) |
| 37% (254/685) | Return Points Win % | 35% (114/327) |
| 29% (10/35) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (3/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (3/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 30% (3/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 77% (13/10) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 23% (13/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (22/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (13/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
